„Studia and Sacksem”: dziedzictwa i innowacje

Autor

  • Andrew P. Carlin Ulster University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.3/1

Słowa kluczowe:

Harvey Sacks

Abstrakt

Głównym celem tego eseju jest nakierowanie czytelniczek i czytelników na dziedzictwa Harveya Sacksa oraz na późniejsze innowacje, które stanowią kontynuację owych dziedzictw. Esej wskazuje także na znaczenie własnych innowacji Sacksa odnoszących się do struktury społecznej oraz teorii. Drugim celem jest wprowadzenie do zawartych w niniejszym zeszycie tematycznym Przeglądu Socjologicznego studiów poświęconych dziełu Harveya Sacksa. Na marzec 2026 roku planowana jest publikacja drugiej części tych studiów.

Bibliografia

Bar-Hillel Yehoshua. 1954. “Indexical expressions”. Mind 63(251): 359–379. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2251354.

Bogen David. 1989. “A reappraisal of Habermas’s Theory of communicative action in light of detailed investigations of social praxis”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19(1): 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00135.x.

Burns Stacy. 2025. “Sacks and Garfinkel, early on”. Przegląd Socjologiczny 74(3): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.3/4. (this issue)

Button Graham, Michael Lynch, Wes Sharrock. 2022. Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and constructive analysis: On formal structures of practical action. Abingdon: Routledge.

Carlin Andrew P. 2021. Sacks’s plenum. In: On Sacks: Methodology, materials and inspirations, R.J. Smith, R. Fitzgerald, W. Housley (eds.), 32–46. Abingdon: Routledge.

Carlin Andrew P., Joana B.V. Marques, Ricardo Moutinho. 2025. Characterising astronomy communication sessions: Topical contextures and partitioning activities. In: New directions in membership categorisation analysis, R. Fitzgerald, W. Housley, R.J. Smith, T. Au Yeung (eds.), Leiden: Brill. In preparation.

Coulter Jeff. 1995. “The Sacks Lectures”. Human Studies 18(2–3): 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323215.

Danby Susan. 2021. “Using observation as a basis for theorizing”: Children’s interactions and social order. In: On Sacks: Methodology, materials and inspirations, R.J. Smith, R. Fitzgerald, W. Housley (eds.), 143–155. Abingdon: Routledge.

Durkheim Émile. 1952. Suicide: A study in sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Fitzgerald Richard. 2024. “Drafting A simplest systematics for the organization of turn‑taking for conversation”. Human Studies 47(3): 613–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09700-7.

Gan Yumei. 2023. “Choreographing digital love: Materiality, emotionality, and morality in videomediated communication between Chinese migrant parents and their left-behind children”. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 28(3): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad006.

Garfinkel Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Garfinkel, Harold. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s program. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Garfinkel Harold, Egon Bittner. 1967. “Good” organizational reasons for “bad” clinic records. In: Studies in ethnomethodology. H. Garfinkel, 186–207. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Garfinkel Harold, Eric Livingston, Michael Lynch. 1981. “The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11(2): 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318101100202.

Garfinkel Harold, Harvey Sacks. 1970. On formal structures of practical actions. In: Theoretical sociology. John C. McKinney, Edward A. Tiryakian (eds.), 337–366. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Jacobsen Michael Hviid, Greg Smith. 2022. Introduction: The persisting presence of Erving Goffman. In: Routledge International Handbook of Goffman Studies. M. Hviid Jacobsen, G. Smith (eds.), 1–12. Abingdon: Routledge.

Jayyusi Lena. 1984. Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge.

Jenkings K. Neil. 2024. “Team talk and the evaluation of medical guidance documentation”. Communication & Medicine. 19(3). https://doi.org/10.3138/cam.25960.

Lee John R.E. 1987. Prologue: Talking organisation. In: Talk and social organisation. G. Button, J.R.E. Lee (eds.), 19–53. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Lerner Gene. 2004. Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lindwall Oskar. 2025. On the analytic orientations and study policies of ethnomethodology’s radical agenda. In: Routledge International Handbook of Ethnomethodology. A.P. Carlin, A. Dennis, K.N. Jenkings, O. Lindwall, M. Mair (eds.), 173–183. Abingdon: Routledge.

Lynch Michael 1999. “Silence in context: Ethnomethodology and social theory”. Human Studies 22(2-4): 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005440501638.

Lynch Michael 2019. “Garfinkel, Sacks and formal structures: Collaborative origins, divergences and the vexed unity of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis”. Human Studies 42(2): 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09510-w.

Lynch Michael, Oskar Lindwall. 2024. Instructed and instructive actions. Abingdon: Routledge.

Mair Michael. 2025. Ethnomethodological readings of philosophy, social theory, and the social sciences. In: Routledge International Handbook of Ethnomethodology. A.P. Carlin, A. Dennis, K.N. Jenkings, O. Lindwall, M. Mair (eds.), 91–103. Abingdon: Routledge.

Mair Michael, Wes Sharrock. 2021. Action, meaning and understanding. In: On Sacks: Methodology, materials and inspirations, R.J. Smith, R. Fitzgerald, W. Housley (eds.), 19–31. Abingdon: Routledge.

McHoul Alec 2005. “Aspects of Aspects: On Harvey Sacks’s «missing» book, Aspects of the sequential organization of conversation (1970)”. Human Studies 28(2): 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-005-4188-0.

McHoul Alec. 2015. The humdrum. In: The Routledge companion to global popular culture. T. Miller (ed.), 112–118. New York: Routledge.

Meehan Albert J. 2025. Egon Bittner’s place in ethnomethodology. In: Routledge International Handbook of Ethnomethodology. A.P. Carlin, A. Dennis, K.N. Jenkings, O. Lindwall, M. Mair (eds.), 71–79. Abingdon: Routledge.

Rawls Anne Warfield. 2005. “Garfinkel’s conception of time”. Time & Society 14(2–3): 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X05055132.

Rudaz Damien 2025. “The (ir)relevance of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis for technology companies: Incommensurability in action”. Human Studies https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-025-09809-x.

Sacks Harvey. 1963. “Sociological description”. Berkeley Journal of Sociology. 8: 1–16.

Sacks Harvey. 1984. Notes on methodology. In: Structures of social action. J.M. Atkinson, J. Heritage (eds.), 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sacks Harvey. 1995. Lectures on conversation. Edited by Gail Jefferson, introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sacks Harvey. 1997. The lawyer’s work. In: Law in action. M. Travers, J.F. Manzo (eds), 43–49. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Sacks Harvey. 1999. “Max Weber’s Ancient Judaism”. Theory, Culture & Society. 16(1): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327699016001002.

Sacks Harvey. 2004. An initial characterization of the organization of speaker turn-taking in conversation. In: Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. G. Lerner (ed.), 35–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Sacks Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation”. Language 50(4): 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243.

Schegloff Emanuel A. 1987. Between micro and macro: Contexts and other connections. In: The Micro-Macro Link. J.C. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Münch, N.J. Smelser (eds.), 207–234. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Schegloff Emanuel A. 1991. Reflections on talk and social structure. In: Talk and social structure. D. Boden, D.H. Zimmerman (eds.), 44–70. Cambridge: Polity.

Schegloff Emanuel A. 1992. Introduction. In Harvey Sacks, Lectures on conversation, Volume 1, edited by Gail Jefferson, ix–lxii. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Schegloff Emanuel A. 1997. “Whose text? Whose context?” Discourse & Society 8(2): 165–187.

Schegloff Emanuel A. 2007. “A tutorial on membership categorization”. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007.

Schegloff Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation”. Language 53(2): 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041.

Schegloff Emanuel A., Harvey Sacks 1973. “Opening up closings”. Semiotica 8: 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289.

Schenkein Jim. 1978. Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.

Sharrock Wes. 2000. “Where the simplest systematics fits: A response to Michael Lynch’s «The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis»”. Text & Talk 20(4): 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.2000.20.4.533.

Silverman David. 1998. Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity.

Watson D.R. 1986. Doing the organization’s work: An examination of aspects of the operation of a crisis intervention center. In: Discourse and institutional authority: Medicine, education and the law. S. Fisher, A.D. Todd (eds.), 91–120. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Watson Rod. 1992. The understanding of language use in everyday life: Is there a common ground? In: Text in context. G. Watson, R.M. Seiler (eds.), 1–19. Newbury Park: Sage.

Watson Rod. 1994. “Harvey Sacks’s sociology of mind in action”. Theory, Culture & Society 11(4): 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327694011004007.

Watson Rod. 1995. Some potentialities and pitfalls in the analysis of process and personal change in counselling and therapeutic interaction. In: Professional and everyday discourse as behavior change. Towards a micro-analysis in psychotherapy process research. J. Siegfried (ed.), 301–339. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Watson Rod. 1997. Some general reflections on “categorization” and “sequence” in the analysis of conversation. In: Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. S. Hester, P. Eglin (eds.), 49–75. Washington DC: University Press of America.

Watson Rod. 2015. De-reifying categories. In: Advances in membership categorisation analysis. R. Fitzgerald, W. Housley (eds.), 23–49. London: Sage.

Watson Rod. 2021a. “Quem «matou» Erving Goffman”. Veredas: Revista de estudos linguísticos. 25(1): 13–42.

Watson Rod. 2021b. Discovering Sacks. In: On Sacks: Methodology, materials and inspirations. R.J. Smith, R. Fitzgerald, W. Housley (eds.), 12–18. Abingdon: Routledge.

Weber Max. 1953. Ancient Judaism. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Wieder D. Lawrence, Don H. Zimmerman, Geoffrey Raymond. 2010. UCLA: Then and now. In: The social history of language and social interaction. W. Leeds Hurwitz (ed.), 127–158. Cresskill NJ: Hampton Press.

Wilson Thomas P. 1991. Social structure and the sequential organization of interaction. In: Talk and social structure. D. Boden, D. H. Zimmerman (eds.), 22–43. Cambridge: Polity.

Znaniecki Florian. 2025. “Basic problems of contemporary sociology”. Przegląd Socjologiczny 74(2): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.2/2.

Opublikowane

2025-09-12

Jak cytować

Carlin , A. P. (2025). „Studia and Sacksem”: dziedzictwa i innowacje. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 74(3), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.3/1

Numer

Dział

ARTYKUŁ WPROWADZAJĄCY