Walking lanes / walking lines: Bodily alignments and passing through doorways

Authors

  • Marc Relieu Télécom Paris, SES, Institut Polytechnique de Paris
  • Catherine Félix Haute École du Travail et de l’Intervention Sociale (HETIS), Nice
  • Rod Watson Lancaster University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2026/75.1/3

Keywords:

body alignment, walking lane, side-by-side walking, doorways, membership categorization

Abstract

There are very few studies that analyse the role of artefacts as shaping joint locomotion in public places. By video-recording pedestrians passing through doorways in a mall, we have observed how openings and doors contribute to mobile formations such as walking lanes or files. Doors play a major part as a focus for common direction. Doors occasion a modification of speed and a re-arrangement of spatial proximity between pedestrians during the process of passing through. We argue that mobile formats such as walking together in public places are based on culturally-methodic dynamics of bodily orientation to others. They are also based on a conjoint orientation to apertures that afford entry spaces to doors through which pedestrians wish to pass. Physical-artefactual boundaries such as doors, sidewalks and lanes play a major role in shaping joint locomotion. We would like to focus on a particular case of locomotion driven by artefacts: the passing through doors shaped by serial arrangements of pedestrians in a following/followed format. We treat this case of mobile formation as a specific genuine form of aggregate in its own right, distinct from side-by-side walking and other forms of mobile file.

References

Gilbert Margaret. 1992. On social facts. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

González-Martínez Esther. 2024. Senior staff member walks ahead, nursing intern follows: Mobility practices in hospital corridors. In: Medical and healthcare interactions: Members’ competence and socialization. S. Keel (ed.). 73–101. Abingdon: Routledge.

González-Martínez Esther, Adrian Bangerter, Kim Lê Van. 2017. “Passing-by «Ça va?» checks in clinic corridors”. Semiotica 215: 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0107.

Ingold Tim. 2004. “Culture on the ground: The world perceived through the feet”. Journal of Material Culture 9(3): 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183504046896.

Ivarsson Jonas. 2012. The turn-organization of pool-skate sessions [Conference presentation]. American Anthropological Association 111th Annual Meeting, November 14–18, San Francisco, CA.

Jayyusi Lena. 1984. Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Lee John R.E., D. Rodney Watson. 1993. Final report to the Plan Urbain: Public space as an interactional order. Paris: Plan Urbain.

Livingston Eric. 1987. Making sense of ethnomethodology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

McIlvenny Paul, Mathias Broth, Pentti Haddington. 2014. “Moving together: Mobile formations in interaction”. Space and Culture 17(2): 104–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508679.

Mondada Lorenza. 2023. Mobile body arrangements in public space: Revisiting “withs” as local accomplishments. In: New perspectives on Goffman in language and interaction: Body, participation and the self. L. Mondada, A. Peräkylä (eds.). 241–275. New York: Routledge.

Norman Don A. 2013. The design of everyday things. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Pollner Melvin. 1979. Explicative transactions: Making and managing meaning in traffic court. In: Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. G. Psathas (ed.). 229–255. New York: Irvington.

Ryave Alan L., James N. Schenkein. 1974. Notes on the art of walking. In: Ethnomethodology: Selected readings. R. Turner (ed.). 265–274. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Sacks Harvey. 1984. Notes on methodology. In: Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. J.M. Atkinson, J. Heritage (eds.). 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sacks Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation (Vol. 1 and 2). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Schenkein Jim. 1978. Sketch of an analytic mentality for the study of conversational interaction. In: Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. J. Schenkein (ed.). 1–6. New York: Academic Press.

Watson Rod. 1999. “La production de l’espace public en ville en tant que champ d’observation phénoménale”. Recherches en Communication 12: 53—80. https://doi.org/10.14428/rec.v12i12.47043.

Weilenmann Alexandra, Daniel Normark, Eric Laurier. 2014. “Managing walking together: The challenge of revolving doors”. Space and Culture 17(2): 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508674.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-13

How to Cite

Relieu, M., Félix, C., & Watson, R. (2026). Walking lanes / walking lines: Bodily alignments and passing through doorways. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 75(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2026/75.1/3

Issue

Section

RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES