“Garście świata”: Studia and Sacksem, część 2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2026/75.1/1Słowa kluczowe:
Harvey Sacks, analiza konstrukcyjna, etnometodologia, kategoryzacja uczestnictwa, badania pracyAbstrakt
Ten esej stanowi wprowadzenie do drugiej części studiów nad Sacksem w Przeglądzie Socjologicznym. Część pierwsza ukazała się jako trzeci zeszyt czasopisma w roku 2025. Obydwie części zaplanowano tak, by ich publikacja zbiegła się z dziewięćdziesiątą rocznicą urodzin i pięćdziesiątą rocznicą śmierci Sacksa oraz trzydziestą rocznicą jednotomowego wydania jego Lectures on conversation. W obu częściach zaświadczamy o tym, że dzieło Sacksa jest nadal radykalne, istotne i żywotne dla nurtów etnometodologicznych, a zatem dla etnometodologii, analizy konwersacyjnej i analizy kategoryzacji uczestnictwa (ang. membership categorization analysis), jak również dla lingwistyki i socjologii. W niniejszym eseju przybliżamy zawartość prezentowanego zeszytu, a także wskazujemy na powiązania między obydwoma częściami studiów and Sacksem w Przeglądzie Socjologicznym.
Bibliografia
Atkinson J. Maxwell. 1978. Discovering suicide: Studies in the organization of sudden death. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Atkinson Michael A. 1980. “Some practical uses of «A natural lifetime»”. Human Studies 3: 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02331799.
Baker Carolyn D. 1983. “A «second look» at interviews with adolescents”. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 12(6): 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088667.
Baker Carolyn D. 1984. “The «search for adultness»: Membership work in adolescent-adult talk”. Human Studies 7(3/4): 301–323. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20008922.
Benson Doug, Paul Drew. 1978. “«Was there firing in Sandy Row that night?»: Some features of the organisation of disputes about recorded facts”. Sociological Inquiry 48(2): 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1978.tb01013.x.
Bjelić Dušan. 2025. Instructed action as non-foundationalist foundations. In: The Routledge international handbook of ethnomethodology. A.P. Carlin, A. Dennis, K.N. Jenkings, O. Lindwall, M. Mair (eds.). 153–160. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429323904-15.
Burns, Stacy. 2025. “Sacks and Garfinkel, early on”. Przegląd Socjologiczny 74(3): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.3/4.
Button Graham. 2026. Harvey Sacks and ethnomethodology: The prospect of an alternate and adequate sociology. Abingdon: Routledge.
Button Graham, Michael Lynch, Wes Sharrock. 2022. Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and constructive analysis: On formal structures of practical action. Abingdon: Routledge.
Carlin Andrew P. 2021. Sacks’s plenum. In: On Sacks: Methodology, materials and inspirations. R.J. Smith, R. Fitzgerald, W. Housley (eds.). 32–46. Abingdon: Routledge.
Carlin Andrew P. 2025. “Sacks studies: Legacies and innovations”. Przegląd Socjologiczny. 74(3): 9–26. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.3/1.
Carlin Andrew P., Younhee Kim. 2025. “Particularization, place-relevant categories and moral order: Kindergarten as a «local organizational ensemble»”. Przegląd Socjologiczny 74(3): 107–134. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.3/7.
Carlin Andrew P., Joana B.V. Marques, Ricardo Moutinho. 2026. Characterizing astronomy communication sessions: Topical contextures and partitioning activities. In: New directions in membership categorization analysis. W. Housley, R. Fitzgerald, T. Au Yeung, R.J. Smith (eds.). Leiden: Brill [in preparation].
Coulter Jeff. 1974. “The ethnomethodological programme in contemporary sociology”. The Human Context 6(1): 103–122.
Coulter Jeff. 1979a. The social construction of mind. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Coulter Jeff. 1979b. Beliefs and practical understanding. In: Everyday language. G. Psathas (ed.). 163–186. New York: Irvington.
Coulter Jeff. 1983. Rethinking cognitive theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Coulter Jeff. 1991. Logic: Ethnomethodology and the logic of language. In: Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. G. Button (ed.). 20–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coulter Jeff. 1995. “The Sacks lectures”. Human Studies 18(2/3): 327–336. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20011087.
Cuff Edward C. 1980. Some issues in studying the problem of versions in everyday life. Manchester Sociology Occasional Papers #3. Department of Sociology, University of Manchester.
Cuff Edward C., David W. Francis. 1978. “Some features of «invited stories» about marriage breakdown”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 18: 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1978.18.111.
Czyżewski Marek. 2025. Review of: Robin James Smith, Richard Fitzgerald, William Housley (eds.): On Sacks: Methodology, materials and inspirations. Przegląd Socjologiczny. 74(3): 135–142. [in Polish] https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2024/74.3/8.
Dennis Alex. 2025. Lay and professional analysis. In: The Routledge international handbook of ethnomethodology. A.P. Carlin, A. Dennis, K.N. Jenkings, O. Lindwall, M. Mair (eds.). 259–266. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429323904-25.
Edwards Derek. 1995. “Sacks and psychology”. Theory & Psychology 5(4): 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354395054006.
Eglin Peter, Stephen Hester. 1992. “Category, predicate and task: The pragmatics of practical action”. Semiotica 88: 243–268. https://doi.org/semi.1992.88.3-4.199.
Firth Alan, Johannes Wagner. 1997. “On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research”. The Modern Language Journal 81(3): 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x.
Gan Yumei. 2023. “Choreographing digital love: Materiality, emotionality, and morality in videomediated communication between Chinese migrant parents and their left-behind children”. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 28(3): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad006.
Garfinkel Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel Harold (ed.). 1986. Ethnomethodological studies of work. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Garfinkel Harold. 1991. Respecification: Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I) – An announcement of studies. In: Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. G. Button (ed.). 10–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garfinkel Harold. 1996. “Ethnomethodology’s program”. Social Psychology Quarterly 59(1): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787116.
Garfinkel Harold. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s program. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Garfinkel Harold, Harvey Sacks. 1970. On formal structures of practical actions. In: Theoretical sociology. J.C. McKinney, E.A. Tiryakian (eds.). 337–366. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Hester Stephen, Peter Eglin. 1997. Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington DC: University Press of America.
Jayyusi Lena. 1984. Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Jenkings K. Neil, Oskar Lindwall, Andrew P. Carlin, Michael Mair, Alex Dennis. 2025. Ethnomethodology and ethnomethodological conversation analysis. In: The Routledge international handbook of ethnomethodology. A.P. Carlin, A. Dennis, K.N. Jenkings, O. Lindwall, M. Mair (eds.). 1–32. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429323904-1.
Kim Younhee, Andrew P. Carlin. 2022. Story appreciation in conversations-for-learning: Stories and gestalt-contextures. In: Storytelling practices in home and educational contexts: Perspectives from conversation analysis. A. Filipi, B. Thanh Ta, M. Theobald (eds.). 201–223. Singapore: Springer.
Lee John R.E. 1984. “Innocent victims and evil-doers.” Women’s Studies International Forum 7(1): 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(84)90086-4.
Lee John R.E. 1991. Language and culture: The linguistic analysis of culture. In: Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. G. Button (ed.). 196–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liberman Kenneth. 2014. “Autochthony: Abandoning social mythologies of rationality”. Human Studies 47(3): 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09715-8.
Lindwall Oskar. 2025. On the analytic orientations and study policies of ethnomethodology’s radical agenda. In: The Routledge international handbook of ethnomethodology. A.P. Carlin, A. Dennis, K.N. Jenkings, O. Lindwall, M. Mair (eds.). 173–183. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429323904-17.
Lynch Michael. 1991. Method: Measurement – ordinary and scientific measurement as ethnomethodological phenomena. In: Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. G. Button (ed.). 77–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lynch Michael. 1999. “Silence in context: Ethnomethodology and social theory”. Human Studies 22(2–4): 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005440501638.
Lynch Michael. 2019. “Garfinkel, Sacks and formal structures: Collaborative origins, divergences and the history of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis”. Human Studies 42(2): 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09510-w.
Lynch Michael, David Bogen. 1994. “Harvey Sacks’s primitive natural science”. Theory, Culture & Society 11(4): 65–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327694011004003.
Matsunaga Shintaro, Nozomi Ikeya. 2025. “Temporality as a member’s problem in real time: An analysis of a prehospital emergency care setting”. Przegląd Socjologiczny 74(3): 83–105. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.3/6.
Maynard Douglas W., S. Clayman. 1991. “The diversity of ethnomethodology”. Annual Review of Sociology 17: 385–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.002125.
McHoul Alec. 2025. “Understanding (and) culture: Working out Sacks’s aphorism”. Przegląd Socjologiczny 74(3): 29–36. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.3/3.
McHoul Alec, David Wills. 1990. Writing Pynchon: Strategies in fictional analysis. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Rawls Anne Warfield. 2005. “Garfinkel’s conception of time”. Time & Society 14(2–3): 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X05055132.
Rose Edward. 2003. A conversation with Harvey Sacks. In: Harold Garfinkel. M. Lynch, W. Sharrock (eds.). 71–84. London: Sage.
Sacks Harvey. 1963. “Sociological description”. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 8: 1–16.
Sacks Harvey. 1985. The inference-making machine. In: Handbook of discourse analysis, volume 3. T.A. van Dijk (ed.). 13–23. London: Academic Press.
Sacks Harvey. 1993. “La description en sociologie”. Cahiers de recherche Ethnométhodologique 1: 7–23.
Sacks Harvey. 1995. Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks Harvey. 1997. The lawyer’s work. In: Law in action. M. Travers and J.F. Manzo (eds.). 43–49. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Sacks Harvey. 1999. “Max Weber’s Ancient Judaism”. Theory, Culture & Society 16(1): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327699016001002.
Sacks Harvey. 2016. “Čtvrtá přednáška (1964/1965) – Improvizovaný přehled literatury” («An impromptu survey of the literature», translated by J. Mlynář, J. Nekvapil, T. Sherman). Biograf 63-64: 103–111.
Sacks Harvey. 2017. Harvey Sacks fare sociologica (selected and translated by E. Canaglia, A. Spreafico, F. Zanetti). Lungavilla: Edizioni Altravista.
Sacks Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation”. Language 50(4): 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010.
Schegloff Emanuel A. 1991. Reflections on talk and social structure. In: Talk and social structure. D. Boden, D.H. Zimmerman (eds.). 44–70. Cambridge: Polity.
Schenkein Jim. 1978. Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.
Schmidt Kjeld. 2018. “«Practice theory»: A critique”. In Socio-Informatics: A practice-based perspective on the design and use of IT artefacts. V. Wulf, V. Pipek, D. Randall, M. Rohde, K. Schmidt, G. Stevens (eds.). 105–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press. V. Wulf,
Sharrock Wes. 2000. “Where the simplest systematics fits: A response to Michael Lynch’s «The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis»”. Text 20(4): 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.2000.20.4.533.
Sharrock Wes, Graham Button. 1991. The social actor: Social action in real time. In Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. G. Button (ed.). 137–175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sharrock Wes, Rod Watson. 1988. Autonomy among social theories: The incarnation of social structures. In: Actions and structure: Research methods and social theory. N.G. Fielding (ed.). 56–77. London: Sage.
Silverman David. 1993. “The machinery of social interaction: Remaking social science”. The Sociological Review 41(4): 731–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb00899.x.
Silverman David. 1998. Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity.
Smith Robin James. 2017. “Membership categorisation, category-relevant spaces, and perception- in-action: The case of disputes between cyclists and drivers”. Journal of Pragmatics 118: 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.007.
Smith Robin James, Richard Fitzgerald, William Housley. 2021. On Sacks: Methodology, materials, and inspirations. Abingdon: Routledge.
ten Have Paul. 2004. Understanding qualitative research and ethnomethodology. London: Sage.
ten Have Paul. 2007. Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. Los Angeles: Sage.
Watson D.R. 1978. “Categorization, authorization and blame-negotiation on conversation”. Sociology 12(1): 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200106.
Watson Rod. 1994. “Harvey Sacks’s sociology of mind in action”. Theory, Culture & Society 11(4): 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327694011004007.
Watson Rod. 1997. Some general reflections on «categorization» and «sequence» in the analysis of conversation. In: Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. S. Hester, P. Eglin (eds.). 49–75. Washington DC: University Press of America.
Watson Rod. 2009. Symbolic interactionism. In: Society and language use. J. Jaspers, J-O. Őstman, J. Verschueren (eds.). 304–313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Watson Rod. 2015. De-reifying categories. In: Advances in membership categorisation analysis. R. Fitzgerald, W. Housley (eds.). 23–49. London: Sage.
Watson Rod. 2021. “Quem «matou» Erving Goffman”. Veredas: Revista de estudos linguísticos. 25(1): 13–42.
Wowk Maria T. 1984. “Blame allocation, sex and gender in a murder interrogation”. Women’s Studies International Forum 7(1): 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(84)90087-6.
