Climate change policy without change. Citizen responsibility, participation and anti-crisis policy in Japan

Authors

  • Beata M. Kowalczyk Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Wydział Socjologii

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.1/3

Keywords:

flooding, Kyushu-Japan, anthropogenic climate change, anti-crisis policy, citizen participation, responsible citizens, a dam on the Kawabe River

Abstract

The effects of climate change have resulted in a notable increase in the intensity and scale of modern natural disasters, which often prove to be a formidable challenge for disaster response systems, thereby accentuating the authorities’ inability to manage risk with the requisite effectiveness. This situation presents an opportunity to modify anti-crisis policy by engaging residents of high-risk areas. However, political actors frequently exploit tragedies to fortify their position by manipulating techniques for engaging and involving social actors in the design of risk minimisation measures. Despite the existence of studies which illustrate the efficacy of participatory projects in public policies, there remains a paucity of research addressing the question of how participation mechanisms are shaped in the sphere of crisis management, how citizens are included or excluded from the process of shaping anti-crisis policies, and how responsibility for decisions and actions is distributed. The article presents an analysis of the involvement of residents in areas prone to flood risk in the process of designing flood policy. Drawing on the empirical material from ethnographic research, participant observation, in-depth interviews, government documents, and press materials, this study aims to elucidate the manner in which Japanese authorities are navigating a shift in policymaking related to the prevention and management of disasters. The article demonstrates how political actors are managing a change in policymaking related to the prevention and management of disasters that de facto serves to maintain and perpetuate their dominant position. The issue of responsibility for decisions made is of particular importance, given the construction of the dam will have a significant impact on the lives of residents and the functioning of river ecosystems in Kyushu.

References

Arnell Nigel W., Simon N. Gosling. 2016. “The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale”. Climatic Change 134: 387–401.

Arnstein Sherry R. 1969. “A ladder of citizen participation”. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4): 216–224.

Arnstein Sherry R. 2012. Drabina partycypacji. W: Partycypacja. Przewodnik Krytyki Politycznej. P. Sadura, J. Erbel (red.), 12–40. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.

Bajek Robert, Yoko Matsuda, Norio Okada. 2008. “Japan’s Jishu-bosai-soshiki community activities: analysis of its role in participatory community disaster risk management”. Nat Hazards 44: 281–292.

Balay-As Marjorie, Jay Marlowe, J.C. Gaillard. 2018. “Deconstructing the binary between indigenous and scientific knowledge in disaster risk reduction: Approaches to high impact weather hazards”. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 30(A): 18–24.

Baptista Nuno, Helena Alves, Nelson Matos. 2019. “Public sector organizations and cocreation with citizens: A literature review on benefits, drivers, and barriers”. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 32(9): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2019.1589623.

Barrios Roberto E. 2017. “What does catastrophe reveal for whom? The anthropology of crises and disasters at the onset of the Anthropocene”. Annual Review of Anthropology 46: 151–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041635.

Birkland Thomas A. 2006. Lessons of disaster: Policy change after catastrophic events. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.

Briggs John. 2005. “The use of indigenous knowledge in development: Problems and challenges”. Progress in Development Studies 5(2): 99–114.

Charmaz Kathy. 2009. Teoria ugruntowana. Praktyczny przewodnik po analizie jakościowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Charmaz Kathy, Linda Liska Belgrave. 2012. Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In: The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. J.F. Gubrium, J.A. Holstein, A.B. Marvasti, K.D. McKinney (eds.), 347–366. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218403.

Chilvers Jason, Michael Kearnes. (red.). 2016. Remaking participation: Science, environment and emergent publics. London, New York: Routledge.

Chilvers Jason, Noel Longhurst. 2016. “Participation in transition(s): Reconceiving public engagements in energy transitions as co-produced, emergent and diverse”. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18(5): 585–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1110483.

Choi Choong-Ik, Junho Choi. 2018. “Distribution and application of community-based disaster risk information: Lessons from Shiga prefecture in Japan”. Journal of Distribution Science 16(6): 15–23.

Dan Chisato. 2020. Kumamoto kenchiji “Damu no arikata mo kangaeru” Kumagawa no chisui taisaku meguri hatsugen (Gubernator prefektury Kumamoto: „Biorę pod uwagę również zaporę”. Wypowiedź na temat polityki przeciwpowodziowej w dorzeczu Kumy). Nishi Nippon Shimbun 6.07.2020.

Hiroi Osamu. 1995. “Earthquake disasters: The need for robust emergency information and transportation networks”. The Wheel Extended 93.

Hitoyoshi Shimokuma Shōbōsho. 2021. Reiwa 2nen 7gatsu gōu katsudō kiroku shi [Raport z działań w czasie ulewnego deszczu w lipcu 2020 roku]. Hitoyoshi: Machida Insatsu.

Hitoyoshi Shi. 2023. Reiwa 2nen 7gatsu gōu. Hitoyoshi shi saigai kiroku, kenshō shi (Ulewny deszcz z lipca 2020 roku. Raport z zapisu i badania katastrofy w mieście Hitoyoshi). Hitoyoshi: Kyōwa Insatsu.

Hiwasaki Lisa, Emmanuel Luna, Rajib Shaw. 2014. “Process for integrating local and indigenous knowledge with science for hydro-meteorological disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in coastal and small island communities”. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 10(2): 15–27.

Hiwasaki Lisa, Emmanuel Luna, Syamsidik, José Adriano Marçal. 2015. “Local and indigenous knowledge on climate-related hazards of coastal and small island communities in Southeast Asia”. Climatic Change 128: 35–56.

Ianniello Mario, Silvia Iacuzzi, Paolo Fedele, Luca Brusati. 2019. “Obstacles and solutions on the ladder of citizen participation: a systematic review”. Public Management Review 21(1): 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1438499.

Innes Judith E., David E. Booher. 2004. “Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century”. Planning Theory & Practice 5(4): 419–436.

Irwin Alan. 2001. “Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences”. Public Understanding of Science 10(1): 1–18.

Joseph Jonathan. 2013. “Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: A governmentality approach”. Resilience 1(1): 38–52.

Kabashima Ikuo. 2020. Kumagawa ryūiki no chisui no hōkōsei ni tsuite (Kierunek ochrony przeciwpowodziowej w dorzeczu Kumy). Kumamoto Ken (Prefektura Kumamoto), https://www.pref.kumamoto.jp/soshiki/1/72640.html [dostęp: 1.07.2024].

Kada Yukiko. 2006. “Three paradigms behind river governance in Japan: Modern technicism, nature conservationism and life environmentalism”. International Journal of Japanese Sociology 15: 40–54.

Kato Kumi. 2017. “Debating sustainability in tourism development. Resilience, traditional knowledge and community: A post-disaster perspective”. Tourism Planning & Development 15(1): 55–67.

Kokudo Kōtsūshō. 2023. Kawabegawa no ryūsuigata damu ni kan suru kankyō eikyō hyōka junbi repōt. (Raport z przygotowania oceny oddziaływania na środowisko dla zapór przepływowych na rzece Kawabe). www.qsr.mlit.go.jp/kawabe/dam/kankyou_torikumi/jyunnbi_report.html [dostęp: 3.07.2024].

Kokudo Kōtsūshō, Kyūshū Chihō Seibikyoku, Yatsuhiro Kasen Kokudō Jimusho. 2021. Reiwa 2nen 7gatsu gōu. Kumagawa suigai denshōki. 1. Kishō no gaiyō (Genealogia powodzi na rzece Kuma. 1. Charakterystyka warunków atmosferycznych). https://kumariver-r0207archive.jp/overview/detail/chapter1-1.html [dostęp: 3.12.2024].

Krüger Marco, Kristoffer Albris. 2021. “Resilience unwanted: Between control and cooperation in disaster response”. Security Dialogue 52(4): 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010620952606.

Lama Juan, Manuel Tironi. 2019. “Distributing obligations, performing publics: Responsible citizens in post-disaster engagement”. Qualitative Sociology 42: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9407-5.

Mainichi Shimbun. 2020. Kumamoto chiji ‘Kawabegawa damu mo sentakushi no hitotsu’. 2008nen ni hakushi tekkai “arata na ketsudan hitsuyō” (Gubernator prefektury Kumamoto „Zapora na rzece Kawabe jako jedno z rozwiązań”. „Potrzeba ponownej decyzji” w sprawie całkowitego wycofania z roku 2008). 26.08.2020.

Maruyama Junichi. 2020. Kawabegawa damu “fukkatsu nai”. Kumamoto Ken no Kabashima chiji Kumagawa chisui de (Nie będzie reaktywacji zapory na Kawabe. Kabashima, gubernator prefektury Kumamoto o polityce przeciwpowodziowej w dorzeczu Kumy). Kumamotonichi Nichishimbun 6.07.2020.

Mercer Jessica, Ilan Kelman, Lorin Taranis, Sandie Suchet-Pearson. 2010. “Framework for integrating indigenous and scientific knowledge for disaster risk reduction”. Disasters 34: 214–239.

Mori Sayaka. 2021. “Hisaishara ni yoru suigai chōsa wa nani o akiraka ni shita ka” (Co ujawniło badanie powodzi przeprowadzone przez osoby poszkodowane w katastrofie?). Kumagawa shunjū 67: 12–20.

Nonomura Atsuko, Kazuhito Fujisawa, Mari Takahashi, Hideo Matsumoto, Shuichi

Hasegawa. 2020. “Analysis of the actions and motivations of a community during the 2017 torrential rains in northern Kyushu, Japan”. International Journal of Environmental Research Public Health 17(7): 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072424.

Ohno Tomohiko. 2022. “Advocacy coalition framework in environmental governance studies: Explaining major policy change for a large dam removal in Japan”. International Review of Public Policy 4(1): 5–36. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.2362.

Ottinger Gwen. 2010. “Buckets of resistance: Standards and the effectiveness of citizen science”. Science, Technology, and Human Values 35(2): 244–70.

Pearce Laurie. 2003. “Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: How to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation”. Natural Hazards 28: 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022917721797.

Polleri Maxime. 2019. “Conflictual collaboration: Citizen science and the governance of radioactive contamination after the Fukushima nuclear disaster”. American Ethnologist 46(2): 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12763.

Rayner Steven. 2012. “Uncomfortable knowledge: The social construction of ignorance in science and environmental policy discourses”. Economy and Society 41(1): 107–125.

Scanlon Joseph, Ira Helsloot, Jelle Groenendaal. 2014. “Putting it all together: Integrating ordinary people into emergency response”. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters 32(1): 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072701403200103.

Seebauer Sebastian, Stefan Ortner, Philipp Babcicky, Thomas Thaler. 2019. “Bottom-up citizen initiatives as emergent actors in flood risk management: Mapping roles, relations and limitations”. Journal of Flood Risk Management 12: e12468. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12468.

Shehata Mohammad, Hideki Mizunaga. 2018. “Flash flood risk assessment for Kyushu Island, Japan”. Environmental Earth Sciences 77(76). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7250-8.

Solway Jacqueline S. 1994. “Drought as a «revelatory crisis»: An exploration of shifting entitlements and hierarchies in the Kalahari, Botswana”. Development and Change 25(3): 471–95.

Tanaka Nobutaka. 2023. Gyōsei wa anata no inochi o mamorenai (Władza nie ochroni twojego życia). Kumamoto: Shimoda.

Takeuchi Kuniyoshi. 2005. “Hydrology as a policy-relevant science in Japan and Monsoon Asia”. Hydrological Processes 18.

UNISDR. 2015. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. Geneva: UNISDR.

Whatmore Sarah J., Catharina Landström. 2011. “Flood apprentices: An exercise in making things public”. Economy and Society 40(4): 582–610.

Wolff Erich. 2021. “The promise of a «people-centred» approach to floods: Types of participation in the global literature of citizen science and community-based flood risk reduction in the context of the Sendai Framework”. Progress in Disaster Science 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100171.

Published

2025-03-07

How to Cite

Kowalczyk, B. M. (2025). Climate change policy without change. Citizen responsibility, participation and anti-crisis policy in Japan. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 74(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.1/3

Issue

Section

ARTICLES