Sztuczna inteligencja a troska o „prawdziwą” sztukę Jak przeceniamy sztukę ludzi i niesprawiedliwie deprecjonujemy sztukę AI?

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26485/AI/2024/26/3

Słowa kluczowe:

sztuczna inteligencja, oryginalność, profesjonalizm, czarne skrzynki, empatia, obawy wobec AI, sztuka, amatorzy

Abstrakt

Gwałtowny rozwój sztucznej inteligencji wywołuje niepokoje wśród wielu grup zawodowych, również wśród artystów, krytyków sztuki i kuratorów. Sprzedaż wykonanych przez AI obiektów na aukcjach sztuki oraz nagrody artystyczne przyznawane komputerowo wygenerowanym obrazom podważają wiele wyobrażeń na temat sztuki, które istnieją zarówno w środowisku artystycznym jak też wśród szerokiej publiczności. Wydaje się jednak, że lęk przed AI jest efektem myślenia życzeniowego na temat działalności artystycznej i jej charakterystyki. Odwołując się do kategorii oryginalności, profesjonalizmu, empatii i „czarnych skrzynek”, artykuł przekonuje, że AI deprecjonowana jest za te same cechy, które znajdujemy w twórczości ludzi, a sztuka tworzona przez ludzi przeceniana jest za cechy, które możemy znaleźć w działaniu AI.

Biogram autora

Łukasz Białkowski - University of the National Education Commission, Cracow

Ph.D. (born 1981) is a university lecturer, art critic, independent curator and translator. His academic research draws on the philosophy of art and social history of media. He particularly focuses on historical narratives about creativity and cultural figures of the artist as well as their relationship to the evolution of the field of art, art institutions and systems for artwork distribution. Member of AICA. He is an assistant professor at the Department of Art Studies at the University of the National Education Commission in Cracow. https://up-krakow.academia.edu/LukaszBialkowski

Bibliografia

Acres Tom (2023) ChatGPT turns one: The first year of the chatbot that changed the world, "Sky News", https://news.sky.com/story/chatgpt-turns-one-the-first-year-of-the-chatbot-that-changedthe-world-13014185 [accessed: 21 June 2024].

Bishop Claire (2004) Antagonism and relational aesthetics, “October”, vol. 110, pp. 51-79.

Boden Margaret A. (2009) Computer Models of Creativity, “AI Magazine”, Fall 2009, pp. 23-34.

Bourdieu Pierre (1995) Rules of art. Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, translated by S. Emmanuel, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Cullins Ashley, Kilkenny Katie (2023) As Writers Strike, AI Could Covertly Cross the Picket Line, "The Hollywood Reporter", https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/writers-strike-ai-chatgpt-1235478681/ [accessed: 21 June 2024].

Demmer Theresa Rahel, Kühnapfel Corrina, Fingerhut Joerg, Pelowski Matthew (2023) Does an emotional connection to art really require a human artist? Emotion and intentionality responses to AI- versus human-created art and impact on aesthetic experience, “Computers in Human Behavior”, vol. 140, pp. 1-19.

Dickie George (1971) Aesthetics, An Introduction. Indianapolis: Pegasus.

Florida Richard (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class, New York: Basic Books.

Flusser Vilém (2020) Towards a Philosophy of Photography, translated by Anthony Mathwes, Reaktion Books: London.

Gangadhrabatla Harsha (2021), The Role of AI Attribution Knowledge in the Evaluation of Artwork, “Empirical Studies of the Arts”, 40(1), pp. 1-19.

Gillick Liam (2006) Contingent Factors: A Response to Claire Bishop’s “Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics”, “October” no. 115, pp. 95-107.

Guadamuz Andres (2017) Artificial intelligence and copyright, “Wipo Magazine”, https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2017/05/article_0003.html [accessed: 21 June 2024].

Jonson Jonathan (2018) A portrait created by AI just sold for $432,000. But is it really art?, “The Guardian”, https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/shortcuts/2018/oct/26/call-that-art-cana-computer-be-a-painter [accessed: 21 June 2024].

Kant Immanuel (1987) Critique of Judgment, transl. W. S. Pluhar, §46, Indianapolis-Cambrige: Hackett Publishing Company.

Keen Andrew (2007) The Cult of Amateur. How Today’s Internet Is Killing Our Culture, Sydney: Currency.

Metz Cade (2023) Chatbots May ‘Hallucinate’ More Often Than Many Realize, "New York Times", https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/06/technology/chatbots-hallucination-rates.htm [accessed: 5 November 2023]

Metz Rachel (2024) AI won an art contest, and artists are furious, “CNN Buisness”, https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/03/tech/ai-art-fair-winner-controversy/index.html [accessed: 21 June 2024].

Milmo Dan (2023) AI doomsday warnings a distraction from the danger it already poses, warns expert, "Guardian", https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/oct/29/ai-doomsday-warnings-a-distraction-from-the-danger-it-already-poses-warns-expert [accessed: 21 June 2024].

Morawski Stefan (1985) Sztuka masowa a elitarna – za i przeciw, in: idem, Na zakręcie od sztuki do po-sztuki, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, pp. 74-104.

Saltz Jerry (2018) An Artwork Made by Artificial Intelligence Just Sold for $400,00. I Am Shocked, Confused, Appalled, “New York Magazine”, https://www.vulture.com/2018/10/an-artificialintelligence-artwork-just-sold-for-usd400-000.html [accessed: 21 June 2024].

Shaw Devin Zane (2012) Freedom and Nature in Schelling's Philosophy of Art, London & New York: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Shaffi Sarah (2023) ‘It’s the opposite of art’: why illustrators are furious about AI, "The Guardian", https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/jan/23/its-the-opposite-of-art-why-illustratorsare-furious-about-ai [accessed: 21 June 2024].

Wu Yuheng, Mou Yi, Li Zhipeng, Xu Kun (2020) Investigating American and Chinese Subjects’ explicit and implicit perceptions of AI-Generated artistic work, “Computers in Human Behavior”, vol. 104, pp. 1-11.

Opublikowane

2024-12-29