Why a Comedy? Giorgio Agamben’s Reflection as an Attempt to Answer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26485/ZRL/2022/65.3/5Keywords:
Divine Comedy, Dante Alighieri, Giorgio Agamben, medieval literature, Italian literatureAbstract
In his text titled Comedy, included in the collection of essays named The End of the Poem, Giorgio Agamben — the famous contemporary Italian philosopher — took up the problem of the ambiguity of Dante Alighieri’s Divine Comedy title. This issue has always been present in Dante studies since the Comedy itself was written. However, Agamben’s essay concerning this topic has not yet been met with interest among researchers of medieval or Italian literature, which seems to be quite significant. In this paper the author critically examines Agamben’s suggestions for interpretation of the title to see if they can broaden the horizon of Dante research. The confrontation of Agamben’s theses with previous concepts — the historical (Giovanni Boccaccio, Benvenuto da Imola) and the contemporary (Erich Auerbach, Amilcare A. Ianucci, Teodolina Barolini) — reveals the originality, but also the controversy of his ideas. The Italian philosopher entangles himself in the philological tradition, pointedly disputing with personages from the exegetical history, but at the same time he expounds his own interpretation. Nevertheless, as the author proves, there is no doubt that Agamben makes a significant contribution to the state of research on the title of the Divine Comedy revealing — among other things — deeply hidden cultural motivations of this academic phenomenon.
References
Agamben Giorgio (1999), The End of the Poem: Studies in Poetics, przeł. D. Heller-Roazen, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Alighieri Dante (1986), Boska Komedia, przeł. E. Porębowicz, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław.
Auerbach Erich (2004), Mimesis. Rzeczywistość przedstawiona w literaturze Zachodu, przeł. Z. Żabicki, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa.
Barański Zygmunt G. (2004), Dante i kategorie literatury, przeł. D. Gostyńska, „Pamiętnik Literacki” z. 3.
Barolini Teodolina (1992), The Undivine Comedy: Detheologizing Dante, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Barolini Teodolina (2016), Dante’s Poets: Textuality and Truth in the Comedy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Bartoloni Paolo (2017), Dante Alighieri [w:] Agamben’s Philosophical Lineage, red. A. Kotsko, C. Salzani, Edinburgh University Press, Edynburg.
Bione Silva Monique (2017), A Divina Comedia revisitada: os percursos reflexivos de Giorgio Agamben nos verbos dantescos, „Anuário de Literatura” nr 2.
Boccaccio Giovanni (2009), Expositions on Dante’s Comedy, przeł. M. Papio, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Casadei Alberto (2010), Il titolo della „Commedia” e l’Epistola a Cangrande, „Allegoria” nr 60.
Curtius Ernst Robert (2018), Literatura europejska i łacińskie średniowiecze, przeł. A. Borowski, TAiWPN Universitas, Kraków.
Dante: Contemporary Perspectives (1997), red. A.A. Iannucci, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Foucault Michel (2019), Historia seksualności. Tom 4: Wyznania ciała, przeł. T. Stróżyński, Słowo/obraz terytoria, Gdańsk.
Geulen Eva (2012), Giorgio Agamben. Wprowadzenie, przeł. M. Ratajczak, Sic!, Warszawa.
Hollander Robert (1983), Tragedy in Dante’s „Commedy”, „The Sewanee Review” nr 2.
Hollander Robert (1993), Dante’s Epistle to Cangrande, The University of Michigan Press, Michigan.
Iannucci Amilcare A. (1973), Dante’s Theory of Genres and the „Divina Commedia”, „Dante Studies, with the Annual Report of the Dante Society” nr 91.
Kant Immanuel (2007), Religia w obrębie samego rozumu, przeł. A. Bobko, Homini, Kraków.
Marchand James (b.r.), Dante to Cangrande: English Version, faculty.georgetown.edu/jod/can-grande.english.html [dostęp: 12.04.2021].
Marchesini Manuela (2011), From Giorgio Agamben’s Italian Category of ‘Comedy’ to ‘Profanation’ as the Political Task of Modernity [w:] Metamorphosing Dante: Appropriations, Manipulations, and Rewritings in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries, red. M. Gragnolati, F. Camilletti, F. Lampart, „Cultural Inquiry” 2, Wiedeń.
Maślanka-Soro Maria (2010), Tragizm w Komedii Dantego, TAiWPN Universitas, Kraków.
Prozorov Sergei (2014), All’s Well That Ends Well: Agamben’s Comic Politics [w:] S. Prozorov, Agamben and Politics: A Critical Introduction, Edinburgh University Press, Edynburg.
Rossi Louis R. (1955), Dante and the Poetic Tradition in the Commentary of Benvenuto da Imola, „Italica” nr 4.
Sardagna Célio Antonio (2014), Divina Comédia: conexões entre Dante e Agamben, „Synesis: Revista do Centro de Teologia e Humanidades” nr 2.
Steadman John M. (1960), Milton and Mazzoni: The Genre of the “Divina Commedia”, „Huntington Library Quarterly” nr 2.
Tavoni Mirko (1998), Il titolo della «Commedia» di Dante, „Nuova Rivista di Letteratura Italiana I” nr 1.
The Cambridge Companion to Dante’s Commedia (2018), red. Z.G. Barański, S. Gilson, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Toynbee Paget (1907), Boccaccio’s Commentary on the „Divina Commedia”, „The Modern Language Review” nr 2.
Watkin William (2010), The Literary Agamben. Adventures in Logopoiesis, Continuum, Londyn.
