Nieefektywność systemów wyborczych w postkomunistycznej Rumunii. Ujęcie przedmiotowe

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26485/SW/2020/30/3

Słowa kluczowe:

nieefektywność, systemy wyborcze, demokracja, rządy prawa, postkomunizm

Abstrakt

In this article, I analyze the ineffectiveness of electoral systems in post-communist Romania using a substantive approach. To this end, I firstly maintain that an effective electoral choice, conducive to actual representativity, is characterized by the following qualities and guarantees: 1)the electorate should have a range of options; 2) the options in question should be viable;3)the persons elected should be willing to implement the will of the electorate; 4) the electedpersons should be held accountable, in one way or another, if they blatantly and systematicallyrefuse to implement the will of the electorate. I then argue that neither of the previously mentioned qualities and guarantees that characterize an effective electoral choice in democratic systems exists in the case of Romania, largely due to its post-communist legacy.

Bibliografia

Blokker Paul. 2012. Romanian Constitutionalism: Form Without Content? (September), https://ssrn.com/abstract=2146568 (access 25.07.2020).

Bușoi Simona. 2011. “Electoral Absenteeism in Romania – A Threat to Democracyˮ. Cogito: Multidisciplinary Research Journal 3 (4).

Cîncea Elena. 2012. “The Evolution of Romanian Electoral System in the Post-Communist Pe-riod: Illusions about Strengthening Democracyˮ. Revista de Știinte politice/Revue des Sciences politiques 35.

Deleanu Ion. 2006. Instituții și proceduri constituționale în dreptul român și în dreptul comparat. București: C.H. Beck.

Enache Marian, Deaconu Ștefan. 2018. “The Electoral System in Post-Communist Romaniaˮ. Revista de Drept Public 3.

Enache Marian, Deaconu Ștefan. 2018. “Romanians’ Vote - A Brief Incursion in the Evolution of the Electoral Systems in Modern and Contemporary Romaniaˮ. Revista de Drept Public, 4.

Mungiu-Pippidi Alina. 2010a. A House of Cards? Building the Rule of Law in East Central Europe (September 1), https://ssrn.com/abstract=1686644 (access 21.07.2020).

Mungiu-Pippidi Alina. 2010b. “Twenty Years of Postcommunism. The Other Transitionˮ. Journal of Democracy 21 (1).

Selejan-Guțan Bianca. 2010. “Transitional Constitutionalism and Transitional Justice in Post-Communist States. The Romanian Caseˮ. Romanian Journal of Comparative Law 2.

Young Patricia T. 2009. Political Parties and Democratic Governance in Romania. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Canada, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1451934 (access 22.07.2020).

Decision no. 80/2014 of the Romanian Constitutional Court on the Legislative Proposal Regard-ing the Revision of the Constitution.

Decision no. 261/2015 § 7 of the Romanian Constitutional Court. Official Gazette no. 260/ 2015.

https://www.romania-insider.com/comment-fall-romanian-leader-liviu-dragnea (access 31.07.2020).

https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/actualitate/video-petre-daea-discurs-naucitor-in-parlamentul-euro-pean-cormoranii-in-romania-fac-baie-in-piscine-1070007 (access 31.07.2020).

Report on the Imperative Mandate and Similar Practices Adopted by the Council for Democratic Elections at its 28th Meeting (Venice, 14 March 2009) and by the Venice Commission at its 79th Plenary Session (Venice, 12–13 June 2009), European Commission for Democracy

Through Law, https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2009)027-e (access 22.07.2020).

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2020-11-26

Numer

Dział

Artykuły