Możliwości zastosowania harmonizacji danych w badaniach mniejszości. Przykład partycypacji politycznej mniejszości rosyjskojęzycznej w krajach byłego Związku Radzieckiego
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2021/70.1/7Słowa kluczowe:
harmonizacja danych, recykling danych sondażowych, dane wtórne, metodologia badań sondażowych, badania mniejszości, partycypacja politycznaAbstrakt
Artykuł przedstawia teoretyczne możliwości i praktyczne zastosowania recyklingu danych sondażowych i ich harmonizacji. Na przykładzie partycypacji politycznej (udziału w demonstracji) ludności rosyjskojęzycznej w krajach byłego Związku Radzieckiego w artykule przedstawiono procedurę harmonizacji kluczowej zmiennej (status mniejszości), zasady i procedury tworzenia zmiennych kontrolnych (kontrola procedur harmonizacyjnych) oraz możliwości praktycznego wykorzystania zmiennych zharmonizowanych do analiz statystycznych. Procedury harmonizacji opisane w tym artykule mogą znaleźć zastosowanie w badaniach zarówno innych rzadkich zjawisk, jak i innych grup mniejszościowych, czyli w badaniach, które często borykają się z problemem małych prób.
Bibliografia
Andreenkova Anna. 2018. How to choose interview language in different countries. In: Advances in comparative survey methods: Multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (3MC), T.P. Johnson, B-E. Pennell, I. Stoop, B. Dorer (eds.), 293–324. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Barrington Lowell W., Erik S. Herron, Brian D. Silver. 2003. “The Motherland is calling. Views of Homeland among Russians in the Near Abroad”. World Politics 55: 290–313.
Corrigall-Brown Catherine. 2012. “From the balconies to the barricades, and back? Trajectories of participation in contentious politics”. Journal of Civil Society. 8: 17–38.
Dalton Russel J. 2006. Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies, 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Doiron Dany, Parminder Raina, Vincent Ferretti, François L’Heureux, Isabel Fortier. 2012. “Facilitating collaborative research: Implementing a platform supporting data harmonization and pooling”. Norsk Epidemiologi 21: 221–224.
Dubrow Joshua K., Irina Tomescu-Dubrow. 2016. “The rise of cross-national survey data harmonization in the social sciences: Emergence of an interdisciplinary methodological field”. Qual Quant 50:1449–1467.
Dubrow Joshua K., Kazimierz M. Słomczyński, Irina Tomescu-Dubrow. 2008. “Effects of democracy and inequality on soft political-protest in Europe: Exploring the European social survey data”. International Journal of Sociology 38(3): 36–51.
Fishbein Martin, Icek Ajzen. 1974. “Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria”. Psychological Review 81(1): 59–74.
Granda Peter, Emily Blaszczyk. 2016. Data harmonization guidelines. Cross-cultural survey guidelines. https://ccsg.isr.umich.edu/chapters/data-harmonization [access: 14.02.2021].
Granda Peter, Christof Wolf, Reto Hadorn. 2010. Harmonizing survey data. In: Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts, J.A H arkness, M. Braun, B. Edwards, T.P. Johnson, L. Lyberg, P. Mohler, B-E. Pennell, T.W. Smith (eds.), 315–334. New York: Wiley.
Hagendoorn Louk, Hub Linssen, Sergei Tumanov (eds.). 2001. Intergroup relations in states
of the former Soviet Union: The perception of Russians. Abingdon-on-Thames: Taylor and Francis.
Hansen Holley E. 2009. Ethnic voting and representation: Minority Russians in post-Soviet states. Iowa Research Online. https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1560&context=etd [access: 14.02.2021].
Heller Monica. 1992. “The politics of code-switching and language choice”. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development 13: 123–142.
Hooghe Marc, Sofie Marien. 2013. “A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe”. European Societies 15(1): 131–152.
Kołczyńska Marta, Kazimierz M. Słomczyński. 2018. Item metadata as controls for ex post harmonization of international survey projects. In: Advances in comparative survey methods: Multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (3MC), T.P. Johnson, B-E. Pennell, I. Stoop, B. Dorer (eds.), 1011–1033. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Kołczyńska Marta, Matthew Schoene. 2018. Survey data harmonization and the quality of data documentation in cross-national surveys. In: Advances in comparative survey methods: Multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (3MC), T.P. Johnson, B-E. Pennell, I. Stoop, B. Dorer (eds.), 963–984. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Kolstø Pal. 1995. Russians in the former Soviet republics. London/Bloomington: Christopher Hurst/Indiana University Press.
Kolstø Pal. 2011. “Beyond Russia, becoming local: Trajectories of adaption to the fall of the Soviet Union among ethnic Russians in the former Soviet Republics”. Journal of Eurasian Studies 2(2): 153–163.
Kosmarskaya Natalia. 2006. Дети Империи в постсоветской Центральной Азии. Адаптивные практики и ментальные сдвиги (русские в Киргизии, 1992–2002) [Children of the “Empire” in post-soviet Central Asia: Mental shift and practices of adaptation (Russians in Kirgizia, 1992–2002)]. Moscow: Natalis Press.
Laitin David. D. 1995. “Identity in formation: The Russian-speaking nationality in the post-Soviet diaspora”. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes De Sociologie Europäisches Archiv Für Soziologie 36(2): 281–316.
Laitin David. D. 1998. Identity in formation: The Russian-speaking populations in the near abroad. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lambert Paul. S. 2005. Ethnicity and the comparative analysis of contemporary survey data. In: Methodological aspects in cross-national research, Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik J.H.P., J. Harkness (eds.), 259–278. Mannheim: GESIS-ZUMA .
Laruelle Marlene. 2015. The “Russian World”. Russian’s soft power and geopolitical imagination. The Center on Global Interests (CGI). http://globalinterests.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/FINAL-CGI_Russian-World_Marlene-Laruelle.pdf [access: 14.02.2021].
Leighley J.E., Vedlitz A. 1999. “Race, ethnicity, and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations. Journal of Politics 61(4): 1092–1114.
Marsh Alan. 1974. “Explorations in unorthodox political behavior: A scale to measure protest potential. European”. Journal of Political Research 2: 107–29.
Oleksiyenko Olena, Wysmulek Ilona Vangeli Anastas. 2018. Identification of processing errors in cross-national surveys. In: Advances in comparative survey methods: Multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (3MC), T.P. Johnson, B-E. Pennell, I. Stoop, B. Dorer (eds.), 985–1010. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Pacheco Gail, Thomas Lange. 2010. “Political participation and life satisfaction: A cross- European analysis”. International Journal of Social Economics 37(9): 686–702.
Peytcheva Emilia. 2008. Language of administration as a source of measurement error: Implications for surveys of immigrants and cross-cultural survey research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Rüdig Wolfgang, Georgios Karyotis. 2014. “Who protests in Greece? Mass opposition to austerity”. British Journal of Political Science 44(3): 487–513.
Słomczyński Kazimierz M., Irina Tomescu-Dubrow. 2006. “Representation of European post-communist countries in cross-national public opinion surveys”. Problems of Post-Communism 53(4): 42–52.
Słomczyński Kazimierz M., Irina Tomescu-Dubrow, Craig J. Jenkins, with Marta Kołczyńska, Przemek Powałko, Ilona Wysmułek, Olena Oleksiyenko, Marcin W. Zieliński, Joshua K. Dubrow. 2016. Democratic values and protest behavior. Harmonization of data from international survey projects. Warsaw: IFiS Publishers.
Słomczyński Kazimierz M., Irina Tomescu-Dubrow. 2018. Basic principles of survey data recycling. In: Advances in comparative survey methods: Multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (3MC), T.P. Johnson, B-E. Pennell, I. Stoop, B. Dorer (eds.), 937–962. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Stockemer Daniel, Benjamin Carbonetti. 2010. “Why do richer democracies survive? The noneffect of unconventional political participation”. Social Science Journal 47(2): 237–251.
Wang Richard Y., Diane M. Strong. 1996. “Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers”. Journal of Management Information Systems 12(4): 5–33.
Weitz-Shapiro Rebecca, Matthew S. Winters. 2008. “Political participation and quality of life”. Working Paper 638, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department, Washington, DC.
Winters Kristi, Sebastian Netscher. 2016. Proposed standards for variable harmonization documentation and referencing: A case study using QuickCharmStats 1.1. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0147795. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0147795 [access:14.02.2021].
Wysmułek Ilona, Olena Oleksiyenko, Przemek Powałko, Marcin W. Zieliński, Kazimierz M. Słomczyński. 2015. Towards standardization: Target variable report template in the
harmonization project. In: Harmonization: Newsletter on survey data harmonization in the social sciences, I. Tomescu Dubrow, J.K. Dubrow (eds.), 1(2): 13–17. https://www.asc.ohiostate.edu/dataharmonization/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/harmonization-newsletter-v1n2-fall-2015-with-issn-_final-3.pdf [access: 14.02.2021].
Zieliński Marcin W., Przemek Powałko, Marta Kołczyńska. 2018. The past, present, and future of statistical weights in international survey projects: Implications for survey data harmonization. In: Advances in comparative survey methods: Multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (3MC), T.P. Johnson, B-E. Pennell, I. Stoop, B. Dorer (eds.), 1035–1052. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Database: Słomczyński Kazimierz M., Craig J. Jenkins, Irina Tomescu-Dubrow, Marta Kołczyńska, Ilona Wysmułek, Olena Oleksiyenko, Przemek Powałko, Marcin W.Zieliński. 2017. SDR 1.0 Master Box, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VWGF5Q, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:HIWud4wueVRsU8wTN+lySg== [fileUNF]
